This article was last edited over 3 years ago. Information here may no longer be accurate. Please proceed with caution, and feel free to contact me.
Saving electricity is great for the environment and my utility bill.
I recently ran some simple experiments to try and figure out which of my computers I'm better off using as a semi-permanent Plex server. My requirements are:
- Power to transcode
- Low drain on electricity
Ideally, I would use a Raspberry Pi, as it has low power requirements and is very cheap. Unfortunately, it's not powerful enough for my needs.
I used a Kill A Watt to crudely measure power consumption between a 100W TDP Core 2 Quad Extreme, and my much more modern 4th generation 65W TDP i5-4570S.
There are a lot of variables here that I was too lazy to normalize. Such as:
What I cared most about was net usage in watts between two existing builds, so that's what I focused on.
Not suprisingly, the older and higher TDP CPU was much more of an electricity hog.
With no spindle drives connected to my Core 2 Quad, after boot, idle wattage was
100 watts. With all 7 drives connected and powered to the same rig, idle usage was
Clearly those disks add a lot of consumption, which makes me think I should go to fewer larger disks rather than multiple small capacity disks.
Despite the added wattage from the disks, the Core i5 is the clear winner at an idle wattage draw of
36 watts. Not only is the idle consumption much lower, but the processor is much more powerful.
As much as I like having the old Core 2 Quad workhorse around, I am not so comfortable knowing how much electricity it's going to use when idle. Good to know. I don't take this as a knock on the Core 2 Quad, but rather an impressive measure of how much more efficient modern processors are.